hey guys i currently have an 05 rsx-s and have been thinking of changing to an s2k, what im wondering, is that if i were to get a full bolt on rsx, (i/rh/e/reflash/rbc) or a full bolt on s2k, (i/rh/e/reflash? do they make one) then which would come out on top whp wise, thanks n00b probably ik

im gona say drivers race

The rsx's top end will take it

IMO, S2 would be the whp winner, but probably come down to a drivers race from a dig...roll, you can pretty much forget about it. (rsx will most likely win a roll)

why you buying the car for straight line performance anyways? take it to the track and see it come alive. looking for a fast straight line car, get a GTO.

^ agreed, this car is a fucking go-kart! in terms of driving experience, this tops the rsx. the cars real easy to throw around, and takes skill to drive. get a stock s2k and mod it yourself

drive a s2k and you will love it for its handling abilities, road feel and drop top :)

Lance

also depends on if its a ap1 or ap2.. ap2 has more torque and ap1 has higher redline

but you all know that ap2 owns hah :)

lol

also depends on if its a ap1 or ap2.. ap2 has more torque and ap1 has higher redline

but you all know that ap2 owns hah :)

hmmm didn't know that:dontknow:....

now you know haha

ap1

also depends on if its a ap1 or ap2.. ap2 has more torque and ap1 has higher redline

but you all know that ap2 owns hah :)

check neg. and sig.

:laughing:

s2k '06+ w/reflash/i/h/e-single/tp will kill a rsx from a dig. from a roll an '05 rsx with kpro/i/rh/e/rbc will be close but will lose to a '06+ s2k. rsx will do better vs the earlier models. i'm not sure you will get much out of the rbc w/ just a reflash, youre going to need the kpro to tune for the rbc.

s2k '06+ w/reflash/i/h/e-single/tp will kill a rsx from a dig. from a roll an '05 rsx with kpro/i/rh/e/rbc will be close but will lose to a '06+ s2k. rsx will do better vs the earlier models. i'm not sure you will get much out of the rbc w/ just a reflash, youre going to need the kpro to tune for the rbc.

that it will lose from a dig is obvious, dont state the obvious. An how do you think it will be close? fanboy much? Awfully big head about having an 07 dont you....:rotfl:

and will hand you you ass in that cheap sloww wrx :stfu:

lol that thing wolud walk the fuck out of you and alot of people on this site..

and will hand you you ass in that cheap sloww wrx :stfu:

haha fanboy much? a bolt-on s2k isn't going to hand many cars their ass...surely not his wrx. don't get me wrong i love the s2k, but you're sadly mistaken if you think a bolt-on s2k is worth a damn in a straight line. kind of ironic that you are calling his car slow when he would walk you.

well ap2 with few bolt ons>>>>full bolt on rsx/tuned. I've had both and the s2k is def faster than my 220whp tuned type s. plus its WAY more fun to drive and no roof ftmfw. i loved my rsx, but you cant compare the two cars by any means. :weeeeeeeeee: the only thing the rsx was better at was carrying more than two people and a set of golf clubs :p

^^^^S2k fanboi

well ap2 with few bolt ons>>>>full bolt on rsx/tuned. I've had both and the s2k is def faster than my 220whp tuned type s. plus its WAY more fun to drive and no roof ftmfw. i loved my rsx, but you cant compare the two cars by any means. :weeeeeeeeee: the only thing the rsx was better at was carrying more than two people and a set of golf clubs :p

and? a bolt-on rsx is slow and a bolt-on s2k is slightly faster(yet still slow)

i wasn't saying my car is fast. it won't even be fast when it's supercharged in a few months, but the dude a few posts up was talkin like he's some badass and talking shit about a car that would put bus lenghts on his bolt-on s2k. i love s2k's and i will probably be buying one in the near future, but i'm not going to be some fanboy who thinks the car is something more than it is. just like the rsx owners around here a lot of you s2k guys seem to think that your car is god's gift. you can like your car and respect others at the same time. that's what i do. just because i like my car doesn't mean i'm biased and ignorant of the truth. bolt-on s2k's are slow in a straight line. don't get butthurt by the truth. it wasn't designed for straightline performance. it's still a great car and will outhandle many cars that have much more power. i didn't say it was a bad car and i didn't say my car was fast. i said s2k's are slow in a str8 line. next time you don't have to get defensive when someone calls an s2k slow...it is. i don't get upset when people call bolt-on rsx's slow...they are

btw AMF Racing that was a nice rsx you had. when did you get the s2k?

rsx fanboy - wait until you grow up with your 418 posts and stop your crying. the dude (me) didn't say a word about fast, only that a s2k will take a rsx, chances are the rsx is going to grind 2nd anyway. without an aftermarket lsd your toast out of a hole or corner. i drove a rsx for 5.5 years and you're not telling me anything new fanboy about the rsx, and you don't know dic about the s2k, and a stock wrx is slow...

who was the cry baby that give me neg rep? :chillout: and please give me more:noes: what a bunch of rsx pus'es:rotfl:

^^^^S2k fanboi


rsx fan and tool - please give me more neg rep. are you 2yrs old?

this was the comment i was talking about.
and will hand you you ass in that cheap sloww wrx :stfu:

i know a bolt-on s2k will beat a bolt-on rsx. i'm not stupid. it was your dumb ass that was trying to say you will hand him his ass in your big bad bolt-on s2k:noes: his wrx is much MUCH faster than your s2k or any bolt-on s2k. i love the s2k i just hate the toolbags and fanboys(i.e. You) that tend to own them.

rsx fanboy - wait until you grow up with your 418 posts and stop your crying. the dude (me) didn't say a word about fast, only that a s2k will take a rsx, chances are the rsx is going to grind 2nd anyway. without an aftermarket lsd your toast out of a hole or corner. i drove a rsx for 5.5 years and you're not telling me anything new fanboy about the rsx, and you don't know dic about the s2k, and a stock wrx is slow...

yea my post count really means a whole lot.:rolleyes: i use this site to find information about my car not to make friends or troll around. Michael Schumacher could join this site tomorrow and he would have a low post count...does that mean he doesn't know shit about cars???:stfu:

i don't know shit about s2k's now?? why because you (who doesn't know shit about me) say so?? i know plenty about all hondas and i am buying a s2k in the very near future. unlike you, when i do buy it i'm not going to be a douchebag/fanboy/troll about it.

who was the cry baby that give me neg rep? :chillout: and please give me more:noes: what a bunch of rsx pus'es:rotfl:

well i'm not a premium member so i can't neg rep you. it must be someone else who thinks you're a fuckin troll


any other irrational bullshit you'd like to spew out??:wavey:

this was the comment i was talking about.


i know a bolt-on s2k will beat a bolt-on rsx. i'm not stupid. it was your dumb ass that was trying to say you will hand him his ass in your big bad bolt-on s2k:noes: his wrx is much MUCH faster than your s2k or any bolt-on s2k. i love the s2k i just hate the toolbags and fanboys(i.e. You) that tend to own them.



yea my post count really means a whole lot.:rolleyes: i use this site to find information about my car not to make friends or troll around. Michael Schumacher could join this site tomorrow and he would have a low post count...does that mean he doesn't know shit about cars???:stfu:

i don't know shit about s2k's now?? why because you (who doesn't know shit about me) say so?? i know plenty about all hondas and i am buying a s2k in the very near future. unlike you, when i do buy it i'm not going to be a douchebag/fanboy/troll about it.



well i'm not a premium member so i can't neg rep you. it must be someone else who thinks you're a fuckin troll


any other irrational bullshit you'd like to spew out??:wavey:

pus - i think you have lost focus - go read my first post in this thread and see how you and other turned that into such bs



i know a bolt-on s2k will beat a bolt-on rsx. i'm not stupid. it was your dumb ass that was trying to say you will hand him his ass in your big bad bolt-on s2k:noes: his wrx is much MUCH faster than your s2k or any bolt-on s2k. i love the s2k i just hate the toolbags and fanboys(i.e. You) that tend to own them. his wrx is slow - if your a honda dude why do think the subr are so fast. i ran a stock sti from a roll in my rsx and it was not fast - if the rsx is slow - it's slow, so a base wrx is even slower.. how many s2k have you driven? besides i don't know what dude has since no mods are listed and giving him crap because he was trolling the s2k threads and cutting s2k owners - he started the bs. my orginal statement was a s2k is faster than a rsx. stock wrx's are slow from a roll....

Michael Schumacher may know cars, but you and him don't know crap about the s2k. and i agree your not here to make friends..

know honda's? can't apply your civic to the s2k. if you hate s2k so much why buy?

s2k '06+ w/reflash/i/h/e-single/tp will kill a rsx from a dig. from a roll an '05 rsx with kpro/i/rh/e/rbc will be close but will lose to a '06+ s2k. rsx will do better vs the earlier models. i'm not sure you will get much out of the rbc w/ just a reflash, youre going to need the kpro to tune for the rbc.

re-read dude - this is completly true and would take children to turn this statement is such bs. i kown you guys love your rsx but the s2k is not slower than a rsx just because a moded '05+ rsx that putting down 215whp takes a stock/early model ap1 that putting down 195-200whp does not make the rsx faster.

from a dig the '06+ s2k's lsd will kill a rsx. from a roll the '05+ rsx w/kpro/i/rh/e/rbc will be close but lose. keep in mind we talking late models of both cars. the later ap2's will run high 13's and the rsx high 14's. with basic bolt-on & hondata the s2k will pull low-mid 13's, rsx with basic bolt-ons will run low 14's to high 13's. the rsx's peg leg is the issue from a dig, but from a roll it will hange ok.
don't think you even want to discuss s2k vs. rsx in the twisties? so i won't go there..

that it will lose from a dig is obvious, dont state the obvious. An how do you think it will be close? fanboy much? Awfully big head about having an 07 dont you....:rotfl:


look at this bs comment from your buddy the troll.
got a time slip for the wrx?

dude why do you keep bringing up the rsx vs. s2k? did you even read what i read?? i already acknowledged that you were right about the s2k vs. rsx. just because i own a rsx doesn't mean i ignore the facts and think that it's faster than an s2k. i was agreeing with you that the s2k is faster. but you were shooting off at the mouth thinking that he has a stock base wrx. his car is not stock and is faster than an 06 sti. he runs 11's if i remember correctly

dude i don't hate the s2k. i love the s2k. i have driven 2 ap1s and 1 ap2. i will buy it b/c i like it. i don't support people's arguments when they are wrong just b/c i like their car. that's retarded. just because i like s2k's doesn't mean i should go along with whatever s2k owners say. you didn't say stock wrx's were slow. you said you would hand him his ass in his cheap slow wrx. but you wouldn't he would walk the shit out of you. i'm not going to agree with you b/c you drive a s2k and i like them.

i have done plenty of research on s2k's wrx's evo's ...hell all performance oriented hondas and most other import cars. you aren't going to teach me shit i don't know you arrogant prick. that's why i'm in this section and s2ki and other forums... to learn about cars. not to soothe arrogant fanboys' egos. sure you have a nice car, but you're obviously an arrogant douchebag fanboy.

oh yea and he's not my buddy either. i usually end up in arguments with him cuz he can be a dick. but most of the time he just pisses people off b/c he tells them the truth and they don't want to hear it.

pus - i think you have lost focus - go read my first post in this thread and see how you and other turned that into such bs



i know a bolt-on s2k will beat a bolt-on rsx. i'm not stupid. it was your dumb ass that was trying to say you will hand him his ass in your big bad bolt-on s2k:noes: his wrx is much MUCH faster than your s2k or any bolt-on s2k. i love the s2k i just hate the toolbags and fanboys(i.e. You) that tend to own them. his wrx is slow - if your a honda dude why do think the subr are so fast. i ran a stock sti from a roll in my rsx and it was not fast - if the rsx is slow - it's slow, so a base wrx is even slower.. how many s2k have you driven? besides i don't know what dude has since no mods are listed and giving him crap because he was trolling the s2k threads and cutting s2k owners - he started the bs. my orginal statement was a s2k is faster than a rsx. stock wrx's are slow from a roll....

Michael Schumacher may know cars, but you and him don't know crap about the s2k. and i agree your not here to make friends..

know honda's? can't apply your civic to the s2k. if you hate s2k so much why buy?

are you serious? what does me liking hondas have to do with whether or not subarus are fast?? i like hondas, but the c6 zo6 corvette is still ridiculously fast!!! by your logic you can only like one automaker's cars and only they are fast. that is the definition of a fanboy. way to call yourself out. troll


i still love the s2k, but i hate the stereotypical s2k owner. you fit that description.:thumbsdow

theres stereo types for s2k owners? lol i thought the only one was that they all are less than 200 lbs lol thats why not everyone can drive one =)

:popcorn:

corners > straights

^^^ true. back to the TS's original post...i would get the s2k( i am going to soon, but i'm still going to keep my rsx). the s2k is way more fun to drive in my opinion. the s2k would win the whp game, but it would only be marginally faster in a str8 line if at all, but straight line performance isn't the reason to buy an s2k anyway. if you're looking for straight line performance buy something else or look into turbochargers or superchargers for the s2k.

When I had my EP3 w/A2 swap, I ran a stock S2K. I had a passenger with me and the S2K did not, S2K had top down. Did a 40 roll and took it to 120mph... I was dead even with them until about 110 and then I started to edge out the S2K. I would've preferred to not have a passenger with me and for the S to have the top up, but that was the result. Basically they're pretty well matched... just keep in mind that modding an S2K does not give NEARLY the gains that a k-series motor will. Honda tapped out the F20/F22C from the factory which is awesome, but also bad if you like to mod. I've got a J's Racing Intake, J's Racing Header, and T1R 70R-EM exhaust on mine and I'd be surprised if I got 10rwhp out of all 3 working together...that said, the car is much more responsive on the throttle. You will spend a lot of money trying to squeeze a few HP out of the motor N/A, but imo the car is a much better experience all around. I have a lot of experience with this too as I started with an EP3, A2 swapped it, sold the car for an '05 S2K, and just recently got an '02 RSX-S for my daily.

Also, mods on the EP3 for the S2K race were:
AEM CAI, Jackson Racing RH, Greddy EvoTT exhaust, kpro (power mods, won't list the rest of the car).

who has the noodz?

I have an AP1 with i/h/e and honestly, if I was stock again, I would have never even done bolt ons for the S. It's completely worthless. Bolt ons for an S won't gain much power at all, especially AP1s.

If I keep my AP1, I'll get it right and go inline pro.

I have an AP1 with i/h/e and honestly, if I was stock again, I would have never even done bolt ons for the S. It's completely worthless. Bolt ons for an S won't gain much power at all, especially AP1s.

If I keep my AP1, I'll get it right and go inline pro.

I hear ya, it can be frustrating for sure. I had an inlinepro turbo kit last year but sold at the end of the year to clear some bills... sure was fun while I had it though :laughing:

I have an AP1 with i/h/e and honestly, if I was stock again, I would have never even done bolt ons for the S. It's completely worthless. Bolt ons for an S won't gain much power at all, especially AP1s.

If I keep my AP1, I'll get it right and go inline pro.


this is what most people say, however.....when you take 4 or 5 bolt ons that give 5-10 horse each you'll def notice some difference. power is power, plus you have to remember with the s2k 5whp is actually more at the motor than a rsx that gains 5whp. s2k has a ot more drivetrain loss than fwd cars. now if your talking power/dollar bolt ons aren't that great for the s2k. back to the original poster. like i said before you can't compare the two cars in any aspect. they both have there ups and downs, but personally i have owned every honda and had pretty much every swap/chasis you can think of, and HANDS DOWN the s2000 is the best/most fun i have ever owned.

:popcorn:

ditto .. lmaos
i drive a base auto IMA OWN YOU ALLL:vtec: :laughing:
jkkkkkkkk dont neg

check neg
just kidding

If you give a hoot about speed why go NA when you can go F/I for roughly the same price?

Want to see/feel more of the power...carbon propeller shaft, well a sturdy aluminum one would work also. Something lighter that's for sure. Definitely higher driveline losses from FR compared to FF, I believe everyone already knows this is the case and if you didn't you learned something new today, go rejoice. :p

emotionap1, maybe change your statement to if you give a hoot about speed in a boring straightline why go NA when you can go FI for roughly the same price? :D

not trying to talk shit but idk why ppl would go from an rsx to an s2000

yea amfracing makes me want to get a s2k

that thing pulls

My reason, the RSX(porker) was not at the level of what I was coming from, a 5R Teggy and since I couldn't bring my Teggy to Guam and had to sell and was not going to buy a used car and wanted a S nisen even before I bought my Teggy. Had my kids to think about on the weekends at that time so the S nisen was not going to happen. So I picked up what I originally wanted to begin with. Though I will sorely miss my Teggy as it was an absolute blast to drive.

not trying to talk shit but idk why ppl would go from an rsx to an s2000

:iamwiths:

not trying to talk shit but idk why ppl would go from an rsx to an s2000

1. convertible top
2. rear wheel drive
3. double wishbone suspension
4. better handling from the factory
5. better feeling behind the wheel (steering, shifting, etc)
6. convertible top

There are tons of reasons... personal preference is probably the most prevalent. you may want to rephrase your question to "idk why ppl who are concerned with straight line speed would go from an rsx to an s2000"

I know one thing, I'll never get rid of my s2k and I definitely will never go back to a RSX. There is a reason why SCCA places the S2000 in A stock and the RSX-S in G stock.

1. convertible top
2. rear wheel drive
3. double wishbone suspension
4. better handling from the factory
5. better feeling behind the wheel (steering, shifting, etc)
6. convertible top

There are tons of reasons... personal preference is probably the most prevalent. you may want to rephrase your question to "idk why ppl who are concerned with straight line speed would go from an rsx to an s2000"

I know one thing, I'll never get rid of my s2k and I definitely will never go back to a RSX.

dont get me wrong I think the s2000 is hawt but if I wanted to upgrade I wouldnt upgrade to an s2000. A convertible top isnt enough reason to get one.

dont get me wrong I think the s2000 is hawt but if I wanted to upgrade I wouldnt upgrade to an s2000. A convertible top isnt enough reason to get one.

and that's your personal preference. I personally don't like parking lot meets so my car is at home on the autox or road course... where the differences are more than clear. :thumbsup:

and that's your personal preference. I personally don't like parking lot meets so my car is at home on the autox or road course... where the differences are more than clear. :thumbsup:

its not about how you use your car. Just cuz I like going to meets and standing around doesnt make your car better then mine. I just dont see how getting rid of an rsx for an s2000 is an "upgrade"

its not about how you use your car. Just cuz I like going to meets and standing around doesnt make your car better then mine. I just dont see how getting rid of an rsx for an s2000 is an "upgrade"

it is all about how you use your car. What else is your car for then? If you like standing around shooting the shit, why not get a Geo and save some $$?

I could honestly care less about the reasons why you don't think a s2k is an upgrade from a RSX.. I can tell you several reasons why I think it is.

1. SCCA classes the S2000 in A stock, which is the 2nd highest stock class behind Super Stock which is where z06's are placed.... I personally like being classed with, and beating NSX's, RS4's, M coupes, E46 M3's, etc. SCCA places the RSX-S in G stock where it isn't really competitive nationally alongside A4's, 325's, Civic Si's, and Mini Cooper S's (who dominate)

2. NASA time trials classes the S2000 in TTC with 12 extra points where they class the RSX-S in straight TTD with no extra points. It's obvious that race organizers see what us S2k owners see.

I know you're not all about doing anything but staring at your car in a parking lot but to people who actually use their car to it's full potential, the difference between a s2k and a RSX-s is miles apart. Which is why I could care less about what you think is "hawt"

Want to see/feel more of the power...carbon propeller shaft, well a sturdy aluminum one would work also. Something lighter that's for sure. Definitely higher driveline losses from FR compared to FF, I believe everyone already knows this is the case and if you didn't you learned something new today, go rejoice. :p

emotionap1, maybe change your statement to if you give a hoot about speed in a boring straightline why go NA when you can go FI for roughly the same price? :D

Seriously man. haha :laughing:

it is all about how you use your car. What else is your car for then? If you like standing around shooting the shit, why not get a Geo and save some $$?

I could honestly care less about the reasons why you don't think a s2k is an upgrade from a RSX.. I can tell you several reasons why I think it is.

1. SCCA classes the S2000 in A stock, which is the 2nd highest stock class behind Super Stock which is where z06's are placed.... I personally like being classed with, and beating NSX's, RS4's, M coupes, E46 M3's, etc. SCCA places the RSX-S in G stock where it isn't really competitive nationally alongside A4's, 325's, Civic Si's, and Mini Cooper S's (who dominate)

2. NASA time trials classes the S2000 in TTC with 12 extra points where they class the RSX-S in straight TTD with no extra points. It's obvious that race organizers see what us S2k owners see.

I know you're not all about doing anything but staring at your car in a parking lot but to people who actually use their car to it's full potential, the difference between a s2k and a RSX-s is miles apart. Which is why I could care less about what you think is "hawt"

Well said. The S2k is a HUGE upgrade from a RSX (I had on 06 Type-S) for those of us that track and autocross our cars :thumbsup: The difference in handling is night and day; I drove Miata's for 5 years and knew the capabilities of S2k's as I autocrossed in the local S2k club's events. Now, I was impressed by my RSX at the track, but I cannot wait to see what the S2k is like.

1. convertible top
2. rear wheel drive
3. double wishbone suspension
4. better handling from the factory
5. better feeling behind the wheel (steering, shifting, etc)
6. convertible top

There are tons of reasons... personal preference is probably the most prevalent. you may want to rephrase your question to "idk why ppl who are concerned with straight line speed would go from an rsx to an s2000"

I know one thing, I'll never get rid of my s2k and I definitely will never go back to a RSX. There is a reason why SCCA places the S2000 in A stock and the RSX-S in G stock.

QFT i would never upgrade from an rsx to an s2000 if i was only concerned with straight-line performance....but that's not why you upgrade anyways. it's not b/c of the minimal bump in horsepower....it's rwd, has an amazing suspension, is a blast to drive, looks beautiful, sounds great for a four cylinder (In My Opinion), handles like a dream, and it's not too bad on gas either...what more could you really ask for?!? (besides a little more power)

I have yet to push my Snisen and I seriously hope that when I do it provides at least as much enjoyment as my R did. Soon I will be able to as my helmet is finally here with all of my household goods, damn that was a LOOOOONG time to get from Okinawa to Guam. So looking forward to getting this out at the auto-x, though I am going to miss gymkhana, but hopefully I can get the guys here that do auto-x to give gymkhana a try every now and then.

QFT i would never upgrade from an rsx to an s2000 if i was only concerned with straight-line performance....but that's not why you upgrade anyways. it's not b/c of the minimal bump in horsepower....it's rwd, has an amazing suspension, is a blast to drive, looks beautiful, sounds great for a four cylinder (In My Opinion), handles like a dream, and it's not too bad on gas either...what more could you really ask for?!? (besides a little more power)

you could ask for an evo

Handling, Convertible, Roadster, RWD.

If that isn't enough then your not a real car enthusiast.

you could ask for an evo

There's a lot more to a car than just straight line speed... go buy a vette if that's what you want. An evo also does all the work for you with it's computer assistance when it comes to handling. Yes it does handle fantastic, but there's a disconnected feel because it's not really YOU making it happen most of the time... especially at the limit. My friend has an evo for a dd and an s2k for fun. He loves both and even though the evo is faster and can handle well, he prefers the S2K any day over the evo. When he takes a corner hard and fast successfully in the S2K, it's reason to be happy because HE made it happen, the evo's computer assisted traction control had to do it for him in the evo... and that's not his fault, just the way the car is designed. The S2K has a raw sports car feel to it, there's no modern day technology to help you out, it's just you in the driver's seat.

You're also missing a big part of what the S2K is about... the driving experience. It puts a smile on your face, you feel connected to it (cheesy I know but it's true), you get to enjoy the top down, the fun of RWD, it's planted and can take nearly any turn at speed w/no troubles, etc. I know I'm not the fastest guy on the road in a straight line... hell, my EP3 w/A2 swap was faster than the S2K's I raced... but it just doesn't matter. What kind of skill do you show as a driver because you can do a 40 roll? Big deal, anyone can mash the gas and shift. Being able to run an autox, track, backroads, etc and be fast in that situation... that's golden.

you could ask for an evo

no thanks. sedans don't do much for me.

if they offered sti couples i would be all over it. why doesn't some company start offering an AWD coupe powered by either a turbo 4cyl or a turbo inline 6 cyl at a more competitive price than a porsche??


Handling, Convertible, Roadster, RWD.

If that isn't enough then your not a real car enthusiast.

quoted for truth. but he already said he prefers his car to look good in a parking lot rather than perform. buy IMO the s2k does that better than an evo :dontknow:

There's a lot more to a car than just straight line speed... go buy a vette if that's what you want. An evo also does all the work for you with it's computer assistance when it comes to handling. Yes it does handle fantastic, but there's a disconnected feel because it's not really YOU making it happen most of the time... especially at the limit. My friend has an evo for a dd and an s2k for fun. He loves both and even though the evo is faster and can handle well, he prefers the S2K any day over the evo. When he takes a corner hard and fast successfully in the S2K, it's reason to be happy because HE made it happen, the evo's computer assisted traction control had to do it for him in the evo... and that's not his fault, just the way the car is designed. The S2K has a raw sports car feel to it, there's no modern day technology to help you out, it's just you in the driver's seat.

You're also missing a big part of what the S2K is about... the driving experience. It puts a smile on your face, you feel connected to it (cheesy I know but it's true), you get to enjoy the top down, the fun of RWD, it's planted and can take nearly any turn at speed w/no troubles, etc. I know I'm not the fastest guy on the road in a straight line... hell, my EP3 w/A2 swap was faster than the S2K's I raced... but it just doesn't matter. What kind of skill do you show as a driver because you can do a 40 roll? Big deal, anyone can mash the gas and shift. Being able to run an autox, track, backroads, etc and be fast in that situation... that's golden.

That was gay brah... sounds like you read that off a magazine.. Just cuz you're saying "the smile it gives you when you drive it" does not make it all that good. Ok I understand all the shit you guys are saying but the world doesn't revolve around autox. Just because you like to do autox and its in a good category does not make it the best. Its still a girls car and I would never bitch because an evo did the "steering" for me. All you guys are bragging about is the convertible and rwd... so what.

Not everyone goes to a dealership and say "hhmmm I wonder if this car is perfect on autox and I wonder if it will put a smile on my face when I drive". Any car can have good suspension you just have to pay for it.

why are you so butt hurt about this? We get it, you don't care about actually using your car, so just accept the fact that we don't have the same priorities and move along... to each his own.

no thanks. sedans don't do much for me.

if they offered sti couples i would be all over it. why doesn't some company start offering an AWD coupe powered by either a turbo 4cyl or a turbo inline 6 cyl at a more competitive price than a porsche??




quoted for truth. but he already said he prefers his car to look good in a parking lot rather than perform. buy IMO the s2k does that better than an evo :dontknow:

Yeah and that's what that is... YOUR opinion. I prefer my car to go fast in straight lines

Not everyone goes to a dealership and say "hhmmm I wonder if this car is perfect on autox and I wonder if it will put a smile on my face when I drive". Any car can have good suspension you just have to pay for it.

you don't have to wonder, all you have to do is look at the S2k's domination in the SCCA nationals the past 8 years... The car is a great autox/tracking car.

my S2000 owns the shit out of my RSX.

and i owned 2 RSXs, so i should know.

this is the 2nd S2000 in my family and both have been amazing cars. i love how this car feels, handles, accelerates, and how EVERYONE looks at it, no matter what age/sex. EVERYBODY eye fucks the shit out of my car. gotta love that, lol.

why are you so butt hurt about this? We get it, you don't care about actually using your car, so just accept the fact that we don't have the same priorities and move along... to each his own.

I'm butthurt? :rotfl: you're the one trying desperately to "convince" me that s2k's are not upgrades. I just stated my opinion I didn't ask for you guys to try to convince me.

I'm butthurt? :rotfl: you're the one trying desperately to "convince" me that s2k's are not upgrades. I just stated my opinion I didn't ask for you guys to try to convince me.

bahahahaha why would I want to lower the s2k gene pool by trying to make you buy one :rotfl: :rotfl: :rotfl: :rotfl: just leave dude, go back to the n00b chat thread

That was gay brah... sounds like you read that off a magazine.. Just cuz you're saying "the smile it gives you when you drive it" does not make it all that good. Ok I understand all the shit you guys are saying but the world doesn't revolve around autox. Just because you like to do autox and its in a good category does not make it the best. Its still a girls car and I would never bitch because an evo did the "steering" for me. All you guys are bragging about is the convertible and rwd... so what.

Gay? Read it off magazine? You're hopeless "brah" ...

lol good one brah...

Gay? Read it off magazine? You're hopeless "brah" ...

Yes gay.. To tell someone "the smile it brings me when I drive" and "you feel connected" is pretty gay

Lol both cars are slow...and the rsx isnt even in the same class as the s2000. Almost a 10 thousand dollar difference between the two. The bottom line is that the s2000 is a great car compared to an Rsx but in its class the s2000 is at the bottom of the barrel.

Both cars are so damn slow. Buy a real car like I did.

Neon SRT-4 FTW!

Both cars are so damn slow. Buy a real car like I did.

Neon SRT-4 FTW!

:lawl:

i have a neon SRT 4 and a caddy CTS.

Believe my my SRT 4 can and will destroy anyone of your 4 wheeled cars anyday...

show some respect to the guy that could destroy anything on 4 wheels that is less than 80k

This thread has officially gone to shit

i have a neon SRT 4 and a caddy CTS.

Believe my my SRT 4 can and will destroy anyone of your 4 wheeled cars anyday...

show some respect to the guy that could destroy anything on 4 wheels that is less than 80k

:rotfl:

:rotfl:

omg.. lol

and with that.. i think i might give this some good old fashioned lockage. all in favor, say aye.

aye, put it out of it's misery

aye

please. lock it it shoould've been locked many many pages ago

all in favor, say aye.

:bow:

Wupike2111111111111111111111111111111111

yes, please kill it :shakehead

5 words.


stupid

people

should

not

breed!

:) :wavey: