This thread is for this vehicle only. Keep the retarded comments to a minimum and make sure it's thread specific. We don't need trolls coming in with comments that don't relate to anything constructive.
Most information regarding this vehicle can be found on toyobaru and ft86club
:fyea:
Stock images thus far from leaked magazine.
Meanwhile, Honda still supports Fail Wheel Drive and Toyota figures it out :happyg:. Discuss
there are sections of the track where both cars are faster/slower. The s2k hands down is faster on the straights. The BRZ has better braking compared to the s2k and is able to stay on the gas longer on certain parts of the track. The BRZ's understeer and low power gave it a 2:07 on buttonwillow. The s2000 had a faster lap time of 2:03. This faster lap time was probably because of more power and better rotation during corners.
The only thing I like about the BRZ over the S2K is that the BRZ is more practical, but I'm not a practical person.
I still think the BRZ's fake side vents are ricey as fk.
I thought the brz was more fun to drive but I need to drive an S2K more I guess. The AP1 s2k's low end is so bad it almost makes you lawl. I think the BRZ has better steering too. s2k's gear box is amazing but the brz's is pretty great too.
well apparently they can handle like 400 something for 100 dyno pulls so 300 shouldn't be an issue if you want to turn a fun sporty car it a highway racing pile of lose
well apparently they can handle like 400 something for 100 dyno pulls so 300 shouldn't be an issue if you want to turn a fun sporty car it a highway racing pile of lose
adding 120-150 bhp won't do a thing to the handling characteristics of the car, if combined with a proper suspension setup. hammerhead, seriously, why do you post the most dumb shit based on no facts?
it wont hurt the handling, but it will make it less fun on curvy back roads because as soon as you get on the throttle it will just outrun the road and when you go to speed back up you will be smacked with turbo lag.
So anyways I am working to have enough to buy an rsx for around 12g next year, but the thought of waiting for a used FR-S is getting my attention. I wonder what one of these will run you pre owned about 2 years old down the road. Finding a good unmolested rsx for less than an assraping in price is getting almost impossible.
If you're working and saving up money to spend ~$12k on a used RSX NEXT year, then you likely won't be able to get a used FR-S/BRZ within two years for anywhere near that amount, unless it's in terrible shape.
Sorry I wrote that a bit too tired. What I meant to say was, I will have around 12g at the end of January, and I can either buy an rsx with cash, or mabie find a pre owned frs to put a huge chunk of change down on. But if I save my money for another year, I might be able to spend around 20k cash anyways.
yeah, by 2015 you could find a nice low-milage 2013 frs for 20K easily (probably more like 18K)...but by then i would just by a '08 S2000 CR instead... :shady:
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Related Threads
?
?
?
?
?
Acura RSX, ILX and Honda EP3 Forum
29.7M posts
179.4K members
Since 2001
A forum community dedicated to Acura RSX, ILX and Honda EP3 owners and enthusiasts. Come join the discussion about performance, modifications, troubleshooting, K24 swaps, turbo kits, and more!