|
![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Master Member
|
Oside Jimc's CTSC RSX-S: Optimized
![]() The above graphs represent the gains seen with new SC specific camshafts (dark blue dotted line) in comparison to stock K20A2 performance (light blue dotted line) as tested with the following components: - K20A2 RSX-S (internally stock bottom end - 11:1cr) - Injen CAI - Comptech Supercharger - Pulley Boys Custom 3" - JR Race Header - Comptech 2.5" catback exhaust - Hondata K-Pro - 650cc RC Injectors - Walbro 255 Oside Jimc is no stranger to the ways of the Dynapack. In fact, if it were not for his personal efforts to establish bonafide baseline tunes, you wouldn't be reading about this today. He laid the groundwork and made it very easy for us to focus on the task at hand. Jim, thank you very much for volunteering your car for testing. It is always a sensitive issue, and represents a fair amount of risk to both parties. I am happy to report positive results. Much appreciation must also go to Church Automotive and Epic Motoring for enduring a 7-day, non-stop testing environment. Their collaborative effort is second to none, and the overall success we've attained as a team would not be possible should there have been any weak links. Thanks fellas for the outstanding work! -Ron |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Master Member
|
holy shit.. 345hp very verrry nice. is that with the stage 2 upgrade? i didnt see it in the mod list but im assuming u do with numbers like that.. very nice again. do u have any pics?
__________________
334whp234tq @13psi = hauls ass
2005 Turbo RSX-S *sold* 2007 Audi A4 Quattro s-line *new* |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Monsters of the Midway
|
So 11.5 lbs, with 91 octane?? What a/f??
Wonder how much a 3 inch exhaust would help?? I'd say 10 ish WHP IMO. ETA for cam release date? How much? Any base map supplied?? Last edited by K20A2_S; 08-04-2005 at 08:21 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
SS Specialist to the 6th
|
NICE. You see how the cams give that boost (pun intended) in the boost levels. It's almost 20 peak WHP!
__________________
My Home Page |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Master Member
|
Quote:
Email the manufacturer for details. Tuned base maps are useless if they aren't provided! -Ron |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
Master Member
|
Quote:
-Ron |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Master Member
|
wow that is awsome! there is no drop in boost at vtec. what is the price gonnna run on these and when can i get them
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
Master Member
|
Quote:
-Ron |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
St00pified Stage V
|
awesome numbers, when do you expect to have the turbo cams out and ready as well?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 | |
|
Master Member
|
Quote:
Testing is to commence ASAP. -Ron |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 | |
|
Master Member
|
omg........ is all i have to say. i have 1 question though, aree these cams going to give a big improvement to top end power. i mean like 4 gear+
__________________
2002 RSX Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 | |
|
St00pified Stage V
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
I <3 the Philippines
|
sweet ive been hearing alot of good things about church, so jim you gonna be at cali speedway the 13th?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
임다니엘
|
Ron, great work!!
__________________
2003 Satin Silver RSX-Type S AEM V2 Intake | DC sports 4-1 Stainless Steel Header | Greddy Evo2 Catback Exhaust | Revo Short Shifter | Type-R JDM Shift Knob | StopTech Slotted Rotors | Type-R Spoiler | Rear JDM Sway Bar | Hondata IMG | Neuspeed X-Brace | Neuspeed Front & Rear Strut Bars | Mugen SS | 225/45WR-17 on Tenzo RS-5 17x7" Gun Metal Rims | Clear Bra & Tint | Pioneer AVIC-N4 w/CDX| MTX Audio Thunder & Eclipse Amps | 2 JL 10' Subs | |
|
|
|
|
|
#19 | |
|
SS Specialist to the 6th
|
Quote:
__________________
My Home Page |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 | |
|
SS Specialist to the 6th
|
Quote:
exactly. And the good thing is, it's not something that we have to refill or switch on. So how do these perform on a car running less boost (we are only running 3.2" pulley). It seems that the higher the revs go, the better the cams perform. Definately can see more power by building up the valvetrain and reving to 9K
__________________
My Home Page |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#21 |
|
RIP 2/4/2009
|
Two words, HOLY SHIT!! My car did that??
Ron I can't even begin to express my gratitude for allowing me to be a part of your development. The HP is nice, but that torque, so much area under the curve, and so much sooner is amazing, I can't wait to get it on the track, too bad I have to wait until the 12th for my private track day to find out. With all that torque I'd better start shopping for some slicks .I wonder how much more it can make with the aftercooler?? Hmmm, I can't wait to get my hands on one to find out. Do you want me to come up tomorrow and put the 9psi (3.3") pulley on so you can tune / dyno at the lower boost?
__________________
The liver is evil, it must be punished
|
|
|
|
|
|
#22 | |
|
Monsters of the Midway
|
Quote:
If they can make +30 WHP with 9lb pulley and pump gas I'll definitley pick up a pair. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
ECU Tuner
|
Ron, Jim -- congratulations! This is awesome.
Ron, a while ago we had the following exchange: Conrad: Ron, since most of us have been told that staying with the stock cams is generally best for FI, could you give us the basics on use and benefit of third party cams for supercharged engines? I am eager to learn from you on this topic. And a great, general thanks for the incredible contributions you have made to this site. Ron: Sure. When FI applications are explored, stock camshafts are generally recommended as opposed to aftermarket cams primarily for the mild amount of overlap they possess. Until now, aftermarket camshafts have been released to appease the NA market. Here's a simple analogy that will help illustrate how valve overlap helps NA tuning. Imagine a drag race where one begins the race from a dead stop, yet the other gets a rolling fly-by. Overlap is that ricer. It literally gives the intake charge a head-start at filling the combustion chamber. This concept does not fare well for FI. As you may know already, overlap allows boost and fuel to blow right through and ignite a good portion of the mixture well out of the combustion chamber through the exhaust. This causes high EGT's. This is very bad. So, for a proper FI camshaft to perform well - overlap must be reduced or eliminately completely. This is what IPS-Kpsi's were designed and engineered to do. Moreover, the ideal FI cam profile will have significantly large lobe area conducive to boosted application. And because there no longer exists an overlap condition, the pressurized intake charge will see less restriction at the valve due to the greater amount of valve lift realized with IPS-Kpsi cams. Lastly, the result from meticulously analyzing valve motion and harmonics, IPS-Kpsi cams allow VE to scale exponentially under boost, with superior valvetrain stability. We'll see torque curves and HP powerbands hold very strong past their peaks, unlike what is seen with stock camshafts. FI amplifies the engine's natural ability to make power. We like to think our cams make the K-series, supernatural. Conrad: Thanks for those elaborations. A specific question: Your average supercharger will be engaged at most 5% of the driving time. The other 95% of the time the bypass valve will be open. So for the most part the engine runs NA. How will special FI cams perform under non-boost operation in terms of power, drivability, mileage and emissions? Ron: Due to this highly specific question, I will need to make observations once they're installed/tuned in a JRSC RSX-S to say with any certainity. =========== Now that the cams have been installed and successfully tested in a Comptech Supercharger engine, can you follow up on the last question? Conrad
__________________
Mods: Stage 3 Comptech SC, AEM CAI, Comptech street header, stock cat, modified stock injectors, Hondata K-Pro, Hondata IMG, Fujitsubo PG catback, cat, 225/45-17 Falken Azenis RT-615 on Kazera rims, Mugen SS, Quaife LSD, CT lightweight flywheel and street clutch, ACT heavy-duty pressure plate, CT rear sway/tie bar and titanium front strut brace, Type-R replica wing, CT short shifter, Auto Meter Sport Comp full-sweep boost gauge. Current results: 290 whp on DynaPack. Web: My RSX and K-Pro page. My Blog: ECU Tuning |
|
|
|
|
|
#25 |
|
Master Mechanic/Tuner
|
NICE....now lets have CTSC vs. CN STG1 ROUND 2, does anybody wanna see this? and o yeah, we will be at the same boost level, i wont boost 14psi...so it will be a level playing field
__________________
K20A2 - 4B11T![]() Bonneville 200 Mph Club Life Member D-Mac Enterprises (INSTALLS) Church Automotive Testing |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Tags |
| ctsc, jimc, optimized, oside, rsxs |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|