Go Back   Club RSX Message Board > PERFORMANCE BASICS > 1/4 Drag Racing


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 03-04-2003, 06:03 PM   #1
benca1
Back in Black
 
benca1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Bay Area
Posts: 10,777
iTrader: (0)
12 second quarter mile traction & power to weight ratio

I hate having to come up with subjects. Should it be interesting? Accurate? Decriptive? Should I insert in capitals, "ALL NUDE HERE."?

Thanks for coming in anyway, I have a question(s).

First; I read somewhere that a power to weight ratio of 10 to 1 makes a 12 second car. That's 10 horses for every 1lb of car. Is this a good general rule? I'm assuming that this is to the wheels, al a dynapack.

I've taken great interest in edos quarter mile time, and unlike our hero kindle, edo provides a video! <hint hint kindle >

Now, kindle hasn't complained, as far as I can remember about any severe traction problems, and his car is clearly putting down less power then edo's. In edo's video you can hear the car spinning the wheels throughout all of first gear.

When the RSX starts to put to the ground what edo's car does, how do you control the traction problem? Edo has mount inserts, sticky tires and a LSD. I thought that this alone would eliminate or seriously limit traction related issues. But I'm an idiot.

What do people do to gain traction at this point? Is there anything less dramatic then modifying the suspension? Drag radials or slicks? What else is there besides putting power to both wheels?

Any input, or just a url wouldbe appreciated. Thanks.
benca1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-2003, 06:21 PM   #2
tenth
*
 
tenth's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: calgary
Posts: 6,981
iTrader: (0)
Re: 12 second quarter mile traction & power to weight ratio

Quote:
Originally posted by benca1
First; I read somewhere that a power to weight ratio of 10 to 1 makes a 12 second car. That's 10 horses for every 1lb of car. Is this a good general rule? I'm assuming that this is to the wheels, al a dynapack.
Other way around. I don't think we'll ever see a 2700whp RSX, 270whp is a little more realistic . Power to weight is generally less than one, but bigger numbers are easier to compare so weight to power is what is generally looked at, but still referred to as power to weight for some reason.
tenth is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-2003, 06:25 PM   #3
mastap
Master Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: OR
Posts: 6,256
iTrader: (0)
Re: 12 second quarter mile traction & power to weight ratio

Quote:
Originally posted by benca1

First; I read somewhere that a power to weight ratio of 10 to 1 makes a 12 second car. That's 10 horses for every 1lb of car. Is this a good general rule? I'm assuming that this is to the wheels, al a dynapack.

.
No its 1hp for every 10lbs of car. So if we took our fat ass cars weight down to 2000lbs we should be close to 12's. Power to Weight is basakwards. It should actually be Weight to Power ratio. By your math we would have to make over 2700hp to hit 12's. See what I mean?

That’s why the Civic hatches that weigh in @ 1800lbs and only have 180hp pull 12's.
__________________
04 Pearl Black STi - Stage 2 - EM, GP Moto 3" TBE, Headers, SRI, Front & Rear Sways, Front & Rear Ties.
mastap is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2003, 12:10 PM   #4
benca1
Back in Black
 
benca1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Bay Area
Posts: 10,777
iTrader: (0)
Oh, duh. Too lazy to edit my post.

Thanks.
benca1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2003, 02:01 PM   #5
ChurchAutoTest
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Wilmington, CA
Posts: 586
iTrader: (0)
Slicks, slicks, slicks. FWD sucks for drag racing, so when you've got a ton of power, you need really sticky tires. With slicks, Edo would easily (without even working hard at it) knock off over 1/2 second from his ETs, and his trap speed might even go up because he's spinning soooo much right now.

Also, the Azenis aren't exactly sticky tires. jdkindle has done a great job getting good launches with them, but they're just somewhat sticky street tires. Edo also picked an unfortunate weekend to be at the track. They'd just repaved Famoso in Bakersfield and traction was decidely less than it was prior to the repaving. Hopefully a couple weeks of racing will put down some more rubber and make it stickier.

I think that with more practice, there's a 13.4-13.5 in his car on drag radials w/o any weight reduction.

SC
__________________
Church Automotive Testing
Dynapack Chassis Dyno 2WD/AWD
300 Quay Ave.
Wilmington, CA 90744
310-518-4966
www.churchdyno.com
ChurchAutoTest is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2003, 02:17 PM   #6
benca1
Back in Black
 
benca1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Bay Area
Posts: 10,777
iTrader: (0)
<sigh> So FWD is a serious impediment to controlling power.

Does anyone know what is done to get these 10 second FWD cars to the finish line so fast? What is the practical limit for a street driven FWD car?
benca1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2003, 03:57 PM   #7
jdkindle
New Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 3
iTrader: (0)
I will be supplying video from tonights runs.....I finally got a camera that I can easily load them with

but, as mentioned, slicks is the most helpful thing (which edo is getting if you have not read already) after that it is drivetrain, then suspension that gets the power to the ground

I am not putting down near as much power as edo, but the difference is, I am able to apply it all at this point......I have a couple more plans, but I would really like to get my hand on a set of slicks that would fit on the car....maybe edo would let me borrow his

another way (what I have done) to get rid of traction problems is seat time......now this can only go so far, but I am a decent example of what it can do
jdkindle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2003, 04:28 PM   #8
jdkindle
New Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 3
iTrader: (0)
Quote:
Originally posted by jdkindle
I will be supplying video from tonights runs.....I finally got a camera that I can easily load them with
cancel that

rain
jdkindle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2003, 04:39 PM   #9
benca1
Back in Black
 
benca1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Bay Area
Posts: 10,777
iTrader: (0)
Interesting that you're both so close in times, and how, to a certain degree, edo's power slows him down. I want my car fast without slicks - mid 13s on street tires. Is this possible?
benca1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2003, 06:27 PM   #10
jdkindle
New Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 3
iTrader: (0)
absolutely....just focus on suspension and drivetrain
jdkindle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2003, 10:41 PM   #11
azrsx02
Member
 
azrsx02's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 89
iTrader: (0)
man you guys need help with your math....he said 10 hp for every 1 lb of car..... 2700lb * 10hp/lb = 27,000hp. haha.
__________________
Apex Silver Evo 8
Apexi AVCR
AEM EMS
HKS 264/272 Cams
5Zigen 3" catback
Perrin 3" downpipe
Perrin cat delete
APS dual port bov
APS cold air intake
APS front mount intercooler
ATS twin disk carbon clutch
Defi boost guage
azrsx02 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2003, 05:10 AM   #12
rsxlerate
Senior Pimp
 
rsxlerate's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Norcal DC5
Posts: 928
iTrader: (0)
lance with a black rsx type-s ran 12.9 and .500 reaction time, 80shot nos and uncorrect size slicks
rsxlerate is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
mile, power, quarter, ratio, traction, weight

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:22 PM.


Privacy Policy  |  Disclaimer Notice
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2001-2010, Club RSX, Inc. All rights reserved worldwide.